DOJ-OGR-00014483.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 _ Filed 08/10/22 Page 83 of 257 2917 LCKCmax5 Summation — Ms. Menninger nothing. Do your former boyfriends or girlfriends still have some photos of you somewhere in their drawer? Does that make you a sex offender if they are? This is straight up sensationalism, your Honor and ladies and gentlemen of the jury. Judge Nathan will instruct you at the end of this case that you are to consider th vidence and you are also to consider the lack of evidence presented to you by the government to meet the highest standard of proof we have in our system, proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Those two concepts are equally important, the evidence and the lack of evidence. What you heard, and more importantly, what you did not hear over the last three weeks is going to convince you that the only correct verdict is not guilty. These accusers in this case had stories to tell about Jeffrey Epstein and, decades later, they inserted Ghislaine Maxwell into their narrative. There were FBI interviews, civil complaints, depositions, interrogatories, settlements, all came and went over those decades. Jeffrey Epstein died and then everyone lawyered up. Every one of the accusers got themselves a lawyer before they first walked in, in September of 2019 in connection with this case, to talk to the FBI. You don't need a lawyer to go talk to the FBI unless you want to get money. Those lawyers sat down with their clients, they met with them, it's all shielded by privilege what they talked about, but we SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00014483