DOJ-OGR-00014705.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 And they are asking, Page 19 of 29 Can we find her LCRVMAXT THE COURT: Wow. MS. MENNINGER: responsible for the return Mexico, where th That's why I are. THE COURT: Okay. MS. MENNINGER: 5 THE COURT: Let me to my question? o they have to be directed Is it your legal flight, but not that try again. flight to New intent was to engage in sexual activity. think they have written it with the commas as they Can I ge position that C a yes or a no the jury must conclude, in order to convict on this count, that the defendant had to aid in the transportation of the flight to New Mexico? MS. MENNINGER: don't believe that -- no, no, it is not my contention. THE COURT: Thank you. MS. MENNINGER: And the reason is the indictment does not specify New Mexico. example. place, the purp activity. It could be a f] OSE THE This is why it's di without assuming a variety of COURT: your comma argument. MS. MENNINGER: Had they placed the comma at SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. (212) 805-0300 agree with It could be a that. icult meanings, ight to New Mexico. for which was to engage in il and flight to New York, So it doesn't have to be to New Mexico. for It could be any llegal sexual to parse the question I'm trying to track Frer New 3136 DOJ-OGR-00014705