DOJ-OGR-00014720.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO he be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCSCMAXT can be relevant in is to fense is wrong. Document 775 to an intent sexual activity under the the same basic discussion my reasoning yesterday, age of question exactly, Count Four, the de the motivating facto r fense's original no, think, was the wrong course, rejected to transport Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 16 the question well enough to be able the whole them of think was unhelpful because, instruction, to New York to 17, think. I think that we've had. So, in addi continue to not know how to parse the jury's Pointing to just the motiva language or to say no. because I don't unders to say no. ting factor language really, including that the point is to remi it's a viol of New York penal law tha t's charged and is activity that they're considering. So, for those reasons, I did want to make a little bit of am in the the illegal s same place. an additional record regarding my extending the deliberations by an hou instructions that extended schedule. deliberate until at extension of what's was until 6 o'clock, asked the jury to mak I think, themselves available to least 6:00 today, largely been our schedule. on the which is a one-hour Although, first night of SOUTH ERN DISTR CT RE PORTERS, Piss (212) 805-0300 3150 engage this tion [ think the proposal made by the other than to know that they are asking about l suggestion to just point to To say tand nd ation exual r, the I gave yesterday regarding that slightly it DOJ-OGR-00014720