DOJ-OGR-00014757.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE M6SQmaxl Carolyn credibly testit Document 779 much when she brought defendant's control of the defendant on occasion paid her direct] probable than not by a preponderance of household and Carol Filed 08/22/22 friends to the massages. lyn's Yr Page 10 of 101 10 fied that she was paid twice as Based on the testimony that find it more the evidence that Virginia was also paid more as encouragement to recruit additional girls. Paragraph 9, there's an objec Kate in this paragraph. deleted because Kat the indictment. MR. EVERDELL: 1s not It argues that a victim of Your Honor, think you said paragraph 9. THE number COURT: did. I'm sorry. for some reason. doesn't assert that Kate was a statutory vic discussed throughout 29. Thank you, that Kate was a victim eo) tion to the I'm sorry to interrupt. I'm skipping the Mr. inclusion of her name should be the crimes charged in first Everdell. t trial and the governmen overrule this objection because the paragraph tim as we've t didn't contend f the crimes charged in the indictment, and that paragraph doesn't assert that she was. these to overrul Jane. Paragraphs 30 to 38, the characterization of thes right here that objections. think there's objection throughout the defendant having groomed the government is the objection is conflating grooming with enticement to travel for purposes of sexual contact. SOUTHERN STR CT RE PORTERS, (212) 805-0300 2) Jane's DOJ-OGR-00014757