DOJ-OGR-00014764.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE M6SQmaxl MR. EVERDELL: THE COURT: So Document 779 That's corre I did reject for the reasons explained in my order. Filed 08/22/22 Ct, the request And as Page 17 of 101 17 your Honor. for redactions [ explained in overruling the objection to paragraphs 39 to 45, testimony and her statement are relevan I've indicated she may give. pertaining to turn to thos when we g EVERDELL: calculation objections and th that? MR. offense level the financial THE continuing ob requests and penalties COURT: Yes, And wi fine and assets and the like. t to the fin Yes, your Ho for now? precisely, I think otherwise that's it for what th that, Mr. e. Everdell, Kate's t to sentencing which there's objections I think we can okay with nor. So we'll delay the ones related to and we'll pick those up. I understand to be jections after probation responded to your assertions. MR. highlight is according to penalties. representatio EVERDELL: paragraph 173, ns that on covering t it does deal TH ma and 193. hat later, with the COURT: Yes, Agree with that, Your Honor, there was an objection, Mr. Everdell? the only one [ believe it's that I would framed which de we take issue with, but i+ als with the financial The government made in their response some fF you're planning we can reserve that till later because financial penalties. I have objections to 172, 178, 192 SOUTHERN D STR CT RE PO RTERS, P.C.» (212) 805-0 300 DOJ-OGR-00014764