DOJ-OGR-00014793.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE M6SQmaxl Cir. 2021) v. Smith, case explains 261.3 in Guidelines." The de applies only if commercial sex act, Document 779 (a) undue int (summary order). a Ninth Circuit case bas Filed 08/22/22 Similar conclusion, from 2013, 7 Page 46 of 101 46 United States 19 F.3d 1120. That offens th level and the undue fluence enhancement "serve unique purposes under the nhancement fense argues that becaus fluence was exerted with it does not apply here. the aim of a Count Six did convict the defendant of to participate in commercial sex acts. Virginia Roberts, brought by Carolyn similarly were paid. including Jane and Annie, money and gifts during their abuse which sa enhancement. The defendant argues Carolyn was not unduly inf to sexually massage The age gap between xceeded ten years, resulting presumption of 7. Carolyn testified she was paid and she n Epstein. Sex The Th But the jury in trafficking Carolyn Court finds that who brought Carolyn and Melissa who was e remaining victims, also testified th Carolyn and and the det massages, Later, ded the money Carolyn returned to find this argument meritl Epstein and the defendant F undue influence. to give for her Epstein becaus at they received tisfies the luenced ss. far Fendant does not rebut the 2G1.1, comment note Epstein sexualized drug addiction. she needed th money taking advantage of T'il e influence. for herself and her newborn son. Plainly, a victim's financial need is a form of undu SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 Ps Ga ® DOJ-OGR-00014793