DOJ-OGR-00014797.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE M6SQmaxl Document 779 Filed 08/22/22 Page 50 of 101 50 the table is more than 5, as 5 levels. And, thus, the total number would be 36. THE COURT: [ presume you agree with that, Mr. Everdell? MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: Under the 2003 manual —- see. The highest total offense level, increase by 4 from 32 to 36. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. Thank you. THE COURT: Thank you, Ms. Moe. And that produces a guideline range 188 to 235. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. MR. EVERDELL: We agree with that, your Honor. THE COURT: Thank you. Same question to you, Mr. Everdell. Preserving your objections, of course, but anything new based on what MR. EV ERD BLL: the government's response was th add Virginia and Melissa as separate groups, that. groups. said? Yes, your Honor. on I don't think because added their request to I know the Court has already ruled on that. think the record is adequate to make them separate of understand the Court has already ruled on we would like to preserve that objection. THE MS. SOUTHERN COURT: MOE: Your Honor, Understood. Do you want to respond, Ms. Thank you. Moe? STR CT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 so we do object fense that, I think the Court's rulings We don't to but DOJ-OGR-00014797