Back to Results

EFTA00433965.pdf

Source: DOJ_DS9  •  Size: 186.2 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 85.0%
PDF Source (No Download)

Extracted Text (OCR)

From: Darren Indyke la> To: Lesley Groff Subject: Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Bear Stearns Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 16:43:16 +0000 Attachments: mime_part_Lpdf Print the email and the attachment for me please. Thanks. Darren K. Indyke Darren K. Indyke, PLLC 301 East 66th Street, 10B New York, New York 10065 Telephone: Direct: Fax: email: *Mt*** *********** *************** ********* ****** ******************* *********** ************* The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC. Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. Copyright of Darren K. Indyke, PLLC - © 2011 Darren K. Indyke, PLLC —All rights reserved. Begin forwarded message: From: Darren Indyke fr" Date: September 16, 2010 3:58:45 PM EDT To: Jeevacation Epstein <jeevacation@gmail.com> Subject: Fwd: Privileged and Confidential - Bear Stearns Shall I delete the provisions providing for withdrawal of the MDL action? Or do you want to increase the settlement amount and keep the withdrawal provisions in? Please advise. Darren Begin forwarded message: From: "Harry Susman" Date: September 16, 2010 3:53:19 PM EDT To: "Darren Indyke' Subject: RE: Privileged and Confidential - Bear Stearns EFTA00433965 Attached is the most recent class action complaint. Now, it can be amended and presumably will be. But the class is defined as purchasers between Dec 14, 2006 and March 14, 2008. Not us. From: Darren Indyke Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 1:05 PM To: Harry Susman Subject: Re: Privileged and Confidential - Bear Steams Is there another class action that relates to us? If so, what is it? Darren On Sep 16, 2010, at 2:00 PM, Harry Susman wrote: I will check but I'm confident we aren't in the class which will include only purchasers of BS stock during two years before the meltdown of BS. Holders won't be included. Harry Susman (w) (c) From: Darren Indyke < To: Harry Susman Sent: Thu Sep 16 12:32:56 2010 Subject: Privileged and Confidential - Bear Steams Harry, As part of the proposed settlement, we are being asked with withdraw the MDL Action in the Southern District relating to the Bear Steams Stock and to refrain from refiling or commencing any other litigation relating to the same, but we are not precluded from participating in what Bear Steams is referring to the Securities Class Action, provided that we cannot opt out and cannot oppose any settlement reached in that Class Action. In the settlement agreement, the Securities Class Action is defined as follows: WHEREAS, a putative securities class action against The Bear Steams Companies, Inc. and related defendants is currently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, captioned In re Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. Securities, Derivative, and ERISA Litigation, Master File No. 08 MDL 1963 (RWS), Securities Action, No. 08 Civ. 2793 (RWS) (the "Securities Class Action"), alleging misrepresentations in connection with Bear Stearns Securities; My question to you is are we still entitled to participate in this class action. Did we lose the right by filing our action? Was there any deadline for us to be file anything to participate in this action? Etc. I don't want to give up the right to sue re the stock if we have already lost the ability to participate in the Securities Class Action. Also, I want to make certain that the Securities Class Action listed in the settlement agreement is in EFTA00433966 fact the right class action. I don't want to state that we are not precluded from participating in this particular class action if it is not the right one and we should have referenced a different one in the Settlement Agreement. This is obviously time sensitive, so please let me know asap. Thanks. Darren On Sep 16, 2010, at 9:28 AM, Harry Susman wrote: Do you want me to tell their lawyers that we don't have a deal so lets resume discovery? Might inflame your buddy at Chase but also might send a signal you are serious and if we aren't going to get a deal, we need to get moving if we have any hope of keeping our hearing date. Harry Susman w) c) From: Jeffrey Epstein < eevacation@gmail.com> To: Jes Staley < Cc: Darren Indyke < >; Harry Susman Sent: Thu Sep 16 07:16:00 2010 Subject: I am having my attorneys now prepare my version of settlement. documents . 16 million dollars. (35 % 46m) --releases , that are clear and delineate the issues. The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of Jeffrey Epstein Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to jeevacation@gmail.com, and destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. EFTA00433967

Document Preview

PDF source document
This document was extracted from a PDF. No image preview is available. The OCR text is shown on the left.

Document Details

Filename EFTA00433965.pdf
File Size 186.2 KB
OCR Confidence 85.0%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 5,449 characters
Indexed 2026-02-11T21:56:30.496386
Ask the Files