DOJ-OGR-00016167.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 741 Filed 08/10/22 Page 57 of 106 LBTVMAX3 Opening —- Ms. topics to ask the client about. good-faith basis to suggest to this jury vidence befor them at this trial; 61 Sternheim That certainly couldn't be a that there will be that these wer mor manipulated by their attorneys who cultivated their specific stories your Honor. told to the government. We think that's inappropriate, THE COURT: I'm going to overrule it at the opening stage. I did not preclude the line of argumentation; I wasn't asked to preclude the line of argumentation. You raised the prospect -- you did certainly and I appreciate it, raise the prospect related to a subpoena of a witness's attorney, which I agree with the government is ent would be able -- but if existing nonprivileged in tirely unclear to me how that fers that it's based on the prof Formation From which the jury could infer that these attorneys structured in some way the questions that were asked, think the Line is basis to say that the attorneys told What evidenc attorneys MR. PAGLIUCA: Honor. Wwe answers to include Ms. Maxwell; have in 2008 interrogatories one told the witnesses what to Well, T'il that deposition you going so we back up a little bit, I don't think you have any the witnesses what to say. to put in that shows the say? your use Carolyn as the example —-— are detailed that do not testimony that is detailed but 91-page complaint detailed, but does not include Ms. Maxwell; a does not include Ms. Maxwell. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016167