DOJ-OGR-00016742.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 13 of 197 2554 oh, Judge has a good point, maybe we could we're not delaying trial. allowed to put announcing a new witness simply f the ownership showed ownership or residency, the way the stipulation if it's just ownership, maybe it's not weren't letting them Maxwell's testimony, they will t was a property deposition that was and she was deposed as a your Honor, it is PG ew LCFCmax1l 1 That's just saying, 2 strengthen this, I'm going to propose a new witness and delay 3 trial. No. 4 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, 5 We only had one day of defense case. We'r 6 on -—- 7 THE COURT: You're 8 because I've questioned the relevance o y) documents by asking if they 10 because thought, well, if 11 relevant, but I'm letting them in. f 12 in, I suppose you'd have a point. 13 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, 14 understand is going to be worded with the government allowing 15 admitting the testimony from Ms. 16 be arguing to the jury that that shows that she didn't reside 17 there, that the ownership records don't show residency, and you 18 can infer from that that maybe she was there at the time 19 period. 20 THE COURT: Is that deposition transcript new 21 information to you? You weren't aware that your client -- 22 MS. MENNINGER: 23 taken in 2019, a slip and fall, 24 third-party witness. They didn't give it to us. We still 25 don't have th ntire deposition. So yes, SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00016742