DOJ-OGR-00016827.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 98 of 197 LCHCmax3 what timeframed. in which the witness testift massages with -- MS. GI individuals who are at issue in this case. jury whether Max MOE: Dubin - direct So you want th tim fram Yes, well and other people, the question knowledge about misconduct this case. The absence of not at issue in THE COU elles! your Honor, 2639 allowed in overruling your motion to preclude is narrowed to the window fied that there was sexualized and limited to particular It's not before the Epstein committed misconduct with is whether she has relevant with the people who are at issue in misconduct wit which the witness testifies. MR. PAG Just so the record is clear, litigated at all LIUCA: can do that, this case is not relevant. think you should narrow th your [ don' pretrial. about Ms. pretrial. This really is th other people who are Honor. tim in fram t believe this was This witness was not questioned Maxwell or not being there, which is going t then into the re activity, o be after sh levant activity. So th this into out of relevant, your H that. onor, time But it seems frankly because if frame, foundational to the n stopped dating h did she see a any of which she considered to be ina at's actually the next question. CO me that ac tivity, which were litigated ext question, im, ny of which is this pperopriate SO she had seen any of I'm moving to be logically I doubt she would have been dating him or would SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORT ERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00016827