DOJ-OGR-00016904.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 175 of 197
LCHVMAX6
hearsay exception.
government
Mr.
lease,
residenc
MS. MENN
NGER:
In this
litigation,
—--— this same
Epstein's abandoning
which kept
under th
fact.
their claims against
summary judgment motion.
the only admission on that point.
in a deposition.
So
ot
terms of
It was admitted by Mr.
him,
That's not
true,
one of
fice -- pu
t forth is that
that propert
the lease.
Epstein.
Ly was
in violation of
2716
your Honor.
the central issues that the
the
and that
is all
It was put
It was admitted on an answer.
him -- which he needed to reside in the
So it was a central
forth in
l covered in the
It was
And then it was testified to
I don't think that saying it was not an
issue in the case can possibly withstand scrutiny when you look
at all of
they said that
these.
Also, the
interviewed this witness,
contradiction to this.
said Mr.
that he was hired in
early
"96. So
I don'
He was hired in
Epstein wasn't living
December of
factual background about
they would call to dispute
this,
t the witness that
we've
and his testimony is not at all in
there
OS,
December of
‘9S. «Ee
for the
rebuttal witness to dispute these documents,
covered both by 201,
MR. ROHRBACH:
That's not
But as a general point,
as well as 804(b) (1).
SOUTHERN
D
STR
CT RE
PORTERS,
(212)
805-0300
all
e)
first three weeks
and took possession in
t think there is a basis to call a
f which are
t accurate about
there's no ques
t this witness.
tion that if
DOJ-OGR-00016904
