DOJ-OGR-00016907.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 178 of 197 2719 LCHVMAX6 advance their claims about from one residenc to anot MS. MENNINGER: says, You asked me tha was, Is it correct tha t quest tL you moved t ejectment and back rent. n the answer itse ther one by a certain date in order to lf, Mr. Epstein tion three time 7Jist in or around the beginning of 1 That's the exact quest THE COURT: What was MS. MENNINGER: times. I believe it from the 996? tion —- the response? s. And the question premises to 9 East You asked me that question three is around then, when. in 1994. So I think under 401, but I don't know exactly And the position of Jane was that he was living there it is a question of whether fferent than the that it was asked three times is to my immediately prior this li There was motive to develop it, your tigation. I mean, that's relevant. It is certainly di testimony -- THE COURT: The fact the argument that it -- contrary ruling, that there was a motive to develop it? MS. MENNINGER: Honor. That was the whole point of can offer the complaint as well, judgment ruling. TH mal COURT Okay. For the same reason, What else ? but it's in the summary it's sustained. SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00016907