DOJ-OGR-00017195.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCKCmax7 Document 767 ‘Filed 08/10/22 Page 174 of 257 3008 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey Kate and Carolyn and Annie. The defense seems to suggest that tion happened from the media, greedy civil None of those actually make sense and this record. this imolantat lawyers, and the FB not one has support in Starting with the media, you heard absolutely nothing at this trial about any of these witnesses consuming media in this case. You heard themselves, you heard that Jane and Annie gave some interviews that Kate also gave an interview, but there is no evidence that any of these different witnesses saw each other's interviews, they weren't asked about it, they didn't say they did. There is no evidence that any witness saw each other's media or anything else about this case in the news. This is a dist Turning to the lawyers. There is not a shred of traction. evidence that a group of lawyers got together, made up a story about Maxwell, minds. Remember, each this theory to work, and then implanted it into these witnesses' witness had a different lawyer. So for four different attorneys had to come up with this story and they separately manipulate their clients into perjuring themselves at a federal trial all so they could get a cut of the no sense for a bunch of Epstein Victim Compensation Fund. That makes different reasons. For one thing, Annie told you that her lawyer is pro bono, working Annie gets from the for free. She doesn't get a cut of whatever fund, so why would she need to make up a SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017195