DOJ-OGR-00017621.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LCLVMAX1 Document 745 that the witness couldn't recognize it, Filed 08/10/22 questions about admissibility than just whether it's relevant or impeaching, anything the witness said on the stand; basis for impeachment. And if some other way, THE 25 COURT: What when the witness lived at 302? MR. ROHRBACH: f rest to answer that question. THE COURT: Sure. MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. I don't recall the particular witness was beginning to clarify on cross-examination Beach, she moved to the second address. specific date -- is that it wasn't a direct contradict it advanced the d the address that's rei may ask Ms. Page 12 of 264 and there are other tion of so it wasn't a proper fense case in it would have been a Rule 16 -- is the government's understanding of Moe, who's but date, that at some point while she was a teenager living in I think ferenced in the taking the the yesterday Palm I don't recall the THE COURT: And you say the second address, what do you mean? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: [ guess what do you mean by the first address, do you mean the pool house? MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. ; be! would explain that at the time that all of this -- ieve the witness 418 SOUTHERN D STR (212) CT REPORTERS, P.C. 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00017621