DOJ-OGR-00017667.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC1QOmax2 and what the date of Document 745 Jane -— Cross the interview was, don't think So today I tried -- THE COURT: L that. MS. MENNINGER: there was an objection says: examination. statement, the witness. contents its And her. f has and Well, Filed 08/10/22 Page 58 of 264 and nobody liked that. I sustained an objection to When examining a wit a part Bu to SO want to be given When showing or at the time. disposing an be to said here's the date and then But in Rule 613(a), it the statement during tness about the witness' prior cause I don't believe prove it later with extrinsic ty need not show it or disclose its contents to t the party must on request show it or disclose adversary party's attorney. I have to show it to vidence, sh an opportunity to explain or deny the statement witness about it. THE prior inconsistent statement. COURT: That's the way I read doesn't remember, My point So the extrinsic evidence of is if the adversary party is given an opportunity to examine the that rule. a witness' she says she it's not an inconsistent statement. You have to get to a point of inconsistency. MS. MENNINGER: Here is the inconsistency. THE COURT: When you're doing it based on what she testified to yesterday, if there's a difference, yes. MS. MENNINGER: That's what I've been trying to do. THE COURT: Here you're saying on this date you said SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212%) 805-0220 464 DOJ-OGR-00017667