DOJ-OGR-00018067.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 194 of 228 870 LC2VMAX6 Alessi Direct be heard on this issue. I apologize. MS. MOE: 'm sorry, your Honor. Just to frame the issue, I recognize we've been clarifying the record about time periods. Our view on authentica tion for this exhibi t is this witness is not authentica I recogniz ting it as a documen Ww t from a particular time period. ve been asking questions about that. The question before the Court is whether this witness can authen Maxwell and ticate this exhibit as a document belonging to his observations of the book. question in terms of our persp THE COURT: That's £1 it was a later book. Ms. Come We thought jury to disregard that testimony. to voir dire, you'll seek admi it, I may not admit it, we were on foundati Epstein or a document that he recognizes based on So we just wanted to frame the ective. ne. I didn't ask the question if y did. There was an objection. on. That ssion, "s where we are. I'm now ruling, sustaining that objection, telling the Then it's the defense's turn 11 rule. I may admit testimony of employee one. MS. MOE: Yes, your H I may reserve until we hear the onor. Thank you. (Continued on next page) SOUTHERN DISTR CT REPORT BRS, Pes (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00018067