DOJ-OGR-00018507.jpg

be N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO a oO = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC6Cmax5 As Q. authorized to use those accounts; 0 Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 McHugh -— cross They would have to be authorized. So someone running the MS. MOE: Objection. THE COURT: Overruled. T'll ask the question again. Someone who is running the family of Fice wou correct? Page 170 of 261 1331 ld have to be Fice would have to family of be authorized to use the accounts that he or she was controlling; A. Q. authority over A. be. Q. You could give authority to do Q. the checking account, a can do that that's not yourself, transactions on right? In that instance And so they could be aut those Can you be Let's take one o that more specific, , yes. accounts; what right? the opera £f the money market accounts, thorized by being given signatory ting document would for example. somebody signing authority over that account and that person can sign checks or do aGCcoune that MS. MOE THE COURT: Let me ifr have a because —— that person would have that without you approving it? Objection. Sustained. try to rephrase that, checking account and I and let's k eep it simple with simple checking account. write a check, I have signatory authority over that SOUTH ERN D STR CT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00018507