DOJ-OGR-00018584.jpg

be NO Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a oO he be No (ee) = Hs Oo _ OY a ~] a oO a Ke} 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC6Cmax7 1s central xe) this case. about the tim early ‘90s. terminated during cer all of Ms. question of I think the det Document 751 Meder Filed 08/10/22 direct Page 247 of 261 1408 There has been witness testimony frame of that relationship, tain time periods. that it began in the Fense has argued that that But, in short, I think Menninger's arguments are arguments that they are r elevance. free to make to the jury but have nothing to do with the These items have been thoroughly authenticated and to the extent the det metadata and make argumen or what it doesn't mean, the jury. authentication or relevance, easily cleared here. THE G pla these represent the 2019 search and th Fense wants to of that's for the Fer witnesses about their ts to the jury about what that means defense to put before It has nothing to do with the question of which are both low bars that are COURT: So the authentication is these items the items that were relationship between Mr. MS. MOE: Yes, these photographs. I wo uld note, your Honor, about metadata, relevanc your Honor. it happens oft Ften Epstein and Ms. Throughout the course of in criminal found in the home during is that they show the Maxwell. with respect to the concern trials that electronic evidence is seized, offered b could only be admitted in court for the jury. i authent tLicated as such, and were th cas that evidence if the people who wrote the SOUTHERN D STRIC I REPORT ERS, (212) 805-0300 PG ew DOJ-OGR-00018584