DOJ-OGR-00018593.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
be
NO
Ww
ws
Oo
OY
~]
oO
Ke)
a
oO
he
be
No
(ee)
=
Hs
Oo
_
OY
a
~]
a
oO
a
Ke}
20
21
22
23
24
25
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
LC6Cmax7
was above the age of
something my client is charged with,
conspiracy in this case.
Document 751
Meder
direct
maturity,
And I
Filed 08/10/22
which is not a crime,
and is not a part of
Page 256 of 261
1417
not
the
think putting on a photograph
like that without any supporting testimony about when it was
taken,
ial.
unduly prejudic
MS.
straws here.
MOE:
Your Honor,
defense counsel
This exhibit is plainly relevant.
consistent with other trial
the suggestion that
Court.
exhibits and I
your Honor.
THE COURT: 33
309.
MS. MOE: Sorr
2,
Vy.
I made any misrepresentation wilt
certainly have not done that and would not
the circumstances under which it was taken is highly,
is grasping at
It's
do take issue with
th the
do that,
the objection is overruled.
With respect to 309,
the person who
haven't reviewed th
final
in
testified this morning as Kate.
formation recently,
want to mak
issue.
evening. My memory is th
name.
MS. MENNINGER:
fil
nam
a representation to the Court and it
We're happy to examine it and report to
for this
that
T un
person is
fortunately
is her
so I
don't
t becomes an
the Court this
first
And the date was 2002 when she was 25.
And she didn't
being taken of
we're going to
her. [ mean, she didn't mention it.
put in a photograph after she's
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
get on the stand and talk about photographs
So now
left the stand.
DOJ-OGR-00018593
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00018593.jpg |
| File Size | 591.7 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 90.6% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,624 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 19:33:38.307842 |