DOJ-OGR-00018872.jpg

fe N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO WO Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE LC8Cmaxl to do with the operation of The relevanc Document 755 _~—s‘ Filed 08/10/22 is extraordinarily remote as there is Page 10 of 262 the Trump company or Mar-a-Lago. nothing to tie in the relationship or to suggest that Virginia Roberts was at Mar-a-Lago during the period of to have seen her father. her. There are no employment records time that Juan Alessi claims for her and THE MS. COURT: So is it a relevance STERNHE IM: It's relevance as well as as a business record. there is nothing in the record to suggest anything concerning objection? foundation relevanc THE COURT: Okay. MR. ROHRBACH: I suppose beginning with th objection, your Honor. The relevance for these documents arises in three respects. First of all initial matter — Sky Roberts, shows that Roberts, are relevant certificate to a Virginia Roberts who was present in as shown on her birth certificate. So of Mar-a-Lago in the inferenc So these records both corroborate the was a Virginia Roberts with an association of the subject of th videnc to connect the Virginia Roberts in the — and this is an already in the case there is a Virginia Roberts with a father named Sky these documents birth that that is the Virginia Roberts who testimony by Carolyn and Juan Alessi the year 2000 which allows the jury the area to draw has been and others. fact that there Mar-a-Lago at the relevant time and corroborate and provide corroboration that SOUTHERN D STR (212) CT REPORTERS, P.C. 805-0300 1715 DOJ-OGR-00018872