DOJ-OGR-00001906.jpg

fe N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) Ww a OY 20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 29 of 91 k7e2MaxC kjc simply implausible that the defendant simply has a lump set of assets and no other stream of income, especially given the lifestyle that she has been living and as detailed in the 29 Pretrial Services report. It just doesn't make sense. Either there are other assets or there is other income. We can't make sense of this lifestyle and this set of financial disclosures. This just doesn't make sense. And as I will detail ina moment, your Honor, it is inconsistent with the limited K Fort to trace the defendant's finances. O ference we have been able to obtain as we have been making an On that subject, your Honor, the report does raise concerns about whether the defendant has been fully transparent about her finances. As one example, the defendant told a corporation, that she does not know the name of the Pretrial Services that the New Hampshire property was owned by corporation, but that she was just permitted to stay in the house. It is difficult to believe that that was a forthcoming answer because it is implausible on its face and very confusing, but the government has continued to investigate the circumstances surrounding the purchase of that New Hampshire property. This morning, your Honor, I spoke with an F.B. agent who recently interviewed a real estate agent involved in that transaction in New Hampshire. The real estate agent told Hy W that the buyers to the house introduced themselves SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 the LQ DOJ-OGR-00001906