Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00019321.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 789.6 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.5%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Cas@ iis 2-O7aB30l0sem Bocuméw 10002 Filed2a0e/92/20agPagé 4 of 3 Haddon, Morgan and Foreman, P.c Laura A. Menninger 150 East 10th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 FX 303.832.2628 www.hmfilaw.com LMenninger@hmflaw.com HADDON MORGAN FOREMAN August 10, 2020 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: August 3, 2020 Order (Doc. 1096) Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: I write in response to the Court’s Order of August 3, 2020 (Doc. 1069), the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (Doc. 1044) (“Protocol”), and to raise with the Court the legal effect of new information that came to the attention of counsel for Ms. Maxwell on Friday, August 7, 2020. New information: On Friday, August 7, 2020, counsel for Ms. Maxwell learned of critical new information that impacts both this action and U.S. v. Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) (the “Criminal Action’). The information implicates Ms. Maxwell’s right to due process and fairness in this civil action and affects the Second Circuit’s review of the Court’s unsealing order of July 23, 2020. Additionally, the information implicates her rights as a criminal defendant guaranteed under the Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Amendments. Counsel makes the representations about implications of the new information as an officer of this Court. At this time, counsel is not at liberty to disclose the information because it is subject to a protective order in the Criminal Action, which forbids its use “for any civil proceeding or any purpose other than the defense” of the criminal action absent “further order of the Court.” Protective Order, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN) at 4 1(a), 18 (Exhibit A). As required by that Protective Order and Judge Nathan’s Individual Practices in Criminal Cases, counsel initiated a conferral with the U.S. Attorney’s Office over the weekend concerning a modification of the Protective Order to share the information with this Court and the Second Circuit. Barring agreement, Ms. Maxwell intends to seek modification of the Protective Order in the Criminal Action from Judge Nathan forthwith to permit sharing the information with this Court, ex parte and in camera if necessary, and with the Second Circuit (likewise under seal if necessary). DOJ-OGR-00019321

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00019321.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00019321.jpg
File Size 789.6 KB
OCR Confidence 94.5%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 2,369 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 19:42:11.286666