Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00019350.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 627.9 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 94.5%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 20-3061, Document 37, 09/16/2020, 2932231, Pages of 24 the Order. (Dist. Ct. Docket Entry 55). On September 10, 2020, Maxwell filed the instant motion to consolidate this appeal with the appeal currently pending in Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413. The Government is not a party to the appeal in Giuffre v. Maxwell, which concerns an order issued in a civil case unsealing materials that were previously filed under seal. ARGUMENT I. THE APPEAL SHOULD BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION A. Applicable Law 1. The Collateral Order Doctrine 10. Title 28, United States Code, Section 1291 expressly limits the jurisdiction of Courts of Appeals to “final decisions of the district courts.” 28 U.S.C. § 1291. “This final judgment rule requires that a party must ordinarily raise all claims of error in a single appeal following final judgment on the merits. Ina criminal case[,] the rule prohibits appellate review until conviction and imposition of sentence.” Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 (1984) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted); accord United States v. Aliotta, 199 F.3d 78, 81 (2d Cir. 1999). As the Supreme Court has “long held,” the “policy of Congress embodied in this statute is inimical to piecemeal appellate review of trial court decisions which do not terminate the litigation, and . . . this policy is at its strongest in the field of criminal law.” United States v. Hollywood Motor Car Co., 7 DOJ-OGR-00019350

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00019350.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00019350.jpg
File Size 627.9 KB
OCR Confidence 94.5%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 1,463 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 19:42:29.154827