DOJ-OGR-00019401.jpg

Case 20-3061, Document 60, 09/24/2020, 2938278, Page2 of 58 Table of Contents Table of Contents .0........cceeeeseeeseeseeeseescesscesceneceueeeseeeeeseeeseesaesaeesaeesaenaeeaesseeeaeeeeeeaes i Table of Authorities .0.........ceeeeeeseeeseeecesscesceeseescecseeeeeeeeesesaesseesaeeaeeaeenaeeaeeeaeeeees ili Statement of the Case and the Facts .......... cs cssseseseesseeeeeseeseeseeseeseesaesaesaeeaesneesaeneas 1 The indictment ...........eceeceeeseeeesceeccesceeeeeeeeseceeeseeaesseesaeeaeeaeseaeeseeeaeens 1 The Civil Case .....eeseeeceeeeseeeseescessceceescescecseeeeesseeesesaessaeeaeesaeeaeeeaeeaeeeaeens 1 TDG: BET POSTS nee: semen. Sos SMELT HANNON. ENDURE ANINLANONNL ORR AEA HRENN 2 The order declining to modify the criminal protective order................. 8 TDG: APA Sie nes sensor seo. OS SENET HEEL NONE. ENON NNINLAONNL SERRE ASE REN 9 Jurisdictional Sta tenets cones norascsonss eos canescens Lane ck Ams Oo Lama ARN KARLIN 10 Ferre Preset, 5: mms ccnmscanes cae .cames RNS KAAS CARA LA RAO A Ra A 22 Summary of the ArgUMENL...... eee cece cess eee ceeeeeeeseeesesescensessesseseaseseessaeaeeaseases 22 ATQUMENL 0... cece ccee cece eseeseeeseesnenseesseusseeseeeseuseeaseesseaseeseeasseuseeseussessesesesseusseesoeasess 23 I. Judge Nathan erred in refusing to modify the protective order for the limited purpose of allowing Ms. Maxwell to share with Judge Preska, under seal, material information [i A. Preservation and standard of review. .........:.:::sccseceeeeeceeeeeeseeeeeseeeeeeaceeeees 26 B. The district court erred in declining to modify the protective order.......... 26 COomclusioN ........::ccscessceesseessceseeesceeseecseeceaeeeanecseessaeesaeenaeeeseeesaeecaeeeaeeeneessaeseaeeeneeesnes 33 Certificate af Comrpliames with, Rule S214 oncosssasmmasrsns semi armas amano nen sam. Sm 35 Certificate of Service......cccccccsccsscessccsecssecesnecseecsseesaneeseeeseeesaeesaeeeeeeseessaeeseeeneeeanes 35 i DOJ-OGR-00019401