DOJ-OGR-00019580.jpg

Case DORESO0BSOUNIENt DocOMAALSE 0 FACE RI04 0g Pagoitid . ; UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK el SEP 04 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, S.D.N.Y. - APPEALS Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, SCRSS0 (IN) Defendant. : —E——— X NOTICE OF APPEAL PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant in the above-captioned case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the district court’s September 2, 2020, Memorandum Opinion and Order denying her motion to modify the protective order. Pichler v. UNITE, 585 F.3d 741, 746 n.6 (3d Cir. 2009) (“We have jurisdiction under the collateral order doctrine to review the denial of the motion to modify the Protective Order and the denial of the motion to reconsider.”); Minpeco S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 832 F.2d 739, 742 (2d Cir. 1987) (denial of motion to modify protective order is immediately appealable under the collateral order doctrine) (citing Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47 (1949)); see also Brown vy. Maxwell, 929 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 2019) (appeal by intervenors challenging denial of motions to modify protective order and unseal). Dated: September 3, 2020. App.121 DOJ-OGR-00019580