DOJ-OGR-00019587.jpg

Case 20-3061, Document 63, 09/24/2020, 2938282, Page3 of 6 yesterday). Ms. Maxwell also requests leave to be excused from publicly filing a redacted version of Appendix Volume 2 on ECF. As grounds for this request, Ms. Maxwell states: This appeal addresses an order by Judge Nathan declining to modify a criminal protective order. A related case, Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 20-2413, addresses an order by Judge Preska unsealing certain deposition material. Ms. Maxwell has filed a motion to consolidate both appeals. Oral argument in both appeals is scheduled for October 13. 1) The unredacted opening brief references material currently under seal and/or shielded by the criminal protective order. 2) Appendix Volume 2 includes all the relevant district court material that is sealed/confidential under the criminal protective. 3) The unredacted version of Ms. Maxwell’s response to the government’s Opposition to the motion to consolidate makes brief reference to confidential/sealed information. To comply with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell can file unredacted versions of this material o/y under seal with this Court. In compliance with the criminal protective order, Ms. Maxwell will publicly file on ECF a redacted copy of her opening brief. She already filed a DOJ-OGR-00019587