DOJ-OGR-00019660.jpg

Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page14 of 23 covered by a protective order, that Court-2 subsequently denied similar relief in another case, and that Maxwell “learned of this information (sealed by other courts) as a result of Rule 16 discovery in this criminal matter.” Ans.Br. 27 (quoting App. 101-02). If only it were so simple. What the government doesn’t acknowledge is that, under the protective order and Judge Nathan’s decision declining to modify it, Ms. Maxwell cannot: ¢ Disclose who the “Recipient” is is ee: e Disclose what material the government obtained iy SC“; e Disclose that the bulk of the government’s criminal case against Ms. Max! Ss es: e Disclose why MM (Court-2) declined the government’s ee: 11 DOJ-OGR-00019660