DOJ-OGR-00019666.jpg

Case 20-3061, Document 94, 10/08/2020, 2948481, Page20 of 23 Pe C2: {fre v. Maxwell but kept secret from Judge Preska and this Court. Finally, the government offers a halfhearted defense of its decision to intervene in Doe v. Indyke, No. 20-cv-00484 (S.D.N.Y.), while choosing to remain on the sidelines of Giuffre v. Maxwell. Ans.Br. 28-29 n.8. According to the government, there is no need to intervene in Giuffre v. Maxwell because discovery was already completed while discovery in Doe v. Indyke was just beginning. But this distinction ignores the government’s position on the confidentiality of the criminal In the criminal case, the government insists iii es, SO secret in fact that Ms. Maxwell must not be allowed to share their contents with Judge Preska or this Court, even under seal. But if that’s right, then the government should oppose unsealing any filings from Giuffre . Mann] EE hasn’t done that, and its answer brief offers o explanation why. The reason, 17 DOJ-OGR-00019666