DOJ-OGR-00001971.jpg

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 95 Filed 12/14/20 Page 2 of 2 United States v. Amodeo (“Amodeo I’), 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995). And the Court also finds that the common law presumption of access attaches. /d. at 146; see also Nixon v. Warner Commce’ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 602 (1978). Nevertheless, in balancing competing considerations against the presumption of access, the Court finds that the redactions are narrowly tailored to properly guard the privacy interests of the individuals referenced in the Defendant’s submission and in the corresponding exhibits. The Defendant is hereby ORDERED to docket the redacted documents and corresponding exhibits. SO ORDERED. AN 0 Ni Dated: December 14, 2020 New York, New York ALISON J. NATHAN United States District Judge DOJ-OGR-00001971