DOJ-OGR-00019931.jpg

ay Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page/2 of 200 9 k7e2MaxC kjc in this case. N Ww ws Oo OY ~] oO Ke) a fan) = be N Ww = Hs Oo a OY a ~] a oO a Ke) 20 21 22 23 24 25 recognized in order number 20MC176, As the chief judge of COVII the district has D-19 remains a national emergency that restricts normal Conducting this proceeding in person is n Second, the measures taken by th than necessary to address operations of the courts. Although the number of limited to 60, courthouse sta of a regular-sized courtroom. able to hear the live audio of access under normal it is necessary to do so ot sa feasible. fely e court are no broader the challenges posed by the pandemic. seats in the jury assembly room is for publ ic and Lastly, given in-person circumstances. th saf there are no reasonable alterna this proceeding safety and is closely equivalent to the number people who would be able to watch an in-court proceeding in The number of people who will be far exceeds ty and technology limitations, Lives to the measures the court has taken. Accordingly, the access provided is fully in accord with the First and Six With those preliminary matters out counsel, Ms. Moe, am I th Amendment public trial rights. of the way, I propose we turn to the arraignment. correct that this iS an arraignment on the Sl superseding indictment? fFference is MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor. THE COURT: Can you explain what the di between the Sl and the original indictment? SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00019931