DOJ-OGR-00019932.jpg

Case 21-58, Document 39-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page73 of 200 10 k7e2MaxC kjc 1 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 2 The difference is a small ministerial correction, a 3 reference to a civil docket number contained in the perjury 4 counts, which are Counts Five and Six of the superseding 5 indictment. Aside from the alteration of those docket numbers, 6 the reference to them, there are no other changes to the 7 indictment. 8 THE COURT: All right. Again, I will conduct the 9 arraignment on the Sl indictment. 10 Ms. Maxwell, have you seen a copy of the S1 indictment 11 in this matter? 12 THE DEFENDANT: saw the original indictment, your 13 Honor. The original -- 14 THE COURT: Okay. 15 All right. Mr. Cohen, did you have an opportunity to 16 discuss with Ms. Maxwell the ministerial change that was 17 completed by way of the superseding indictment? 18 MR. COHEN: Yes, yes, Judg We have, your Honor. 19 THE COURT: Any objection to proceeding on the 20 arraignment of the Sl indictment, Mr. Cohen? 21 MR. COHEN: No, your Honor. 22 THE COURT: All right. 23 Ms. Maxwell, have you had an opportunity to discuss 24 the indictment in this case with your attorney? 25 THE DEFENDANT: [ have, your Honor. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR- 00019932