DOJ-OGR-00020366.jpg

Case 21-58, Document 92, 05/27/2021, 3109708, Page8 of 24 “unpersuaded” by Maxwell’s argument “that the conditions of her confinement are uniquely onerous, interfere with her ability to participate in her defense, and thus justify release.” (/d. at 20). In particular, Maxwell did not “meaningfully dispute” that she has received more time than other inmates at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) to review discovery and as much, if not more, time to communicate with her lawyers. (/d.). 14. Third, on February 23, 2021, Maxwell filed yet another bail application, proposing two additional bail conditions. (Ex. I). After considering multiple written submissions (Ex. I, J, K), Judge Nathan denied Maxwell’s request in another written opinion (Ex. L). Judge Nathan reiterated that detention was warranted in light of the proffered strength and nature of the Government’s case, 14 Maxwell’s “substantial international ties, familial and personal connections abroad, substantial financial resources, and experience evading detection,” and Maxwell’s “lack of candor regarding her assets” at the time of her arrest. (/d. at7). Judge Nathan noted, “If the Court could conclude that any set of conditions could reasonably assure the Defendant’s future appearance, it would order her release. Yet while her proposed bail package is substantial, it cannot provide such reasonable assurances.” (/d. at 11). 15. Throughout the pendency of this case, Judge Nathan has closely DOJ-OGR-00020366