DOJ-OGR-00020451.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 1-2, 07/08/2022, 3344417, Page65 of 91 that are consistent with the Court's ruling or indicate that they have none on or before November 21, 2021. This resolves Dkt. Nos. 387, 444. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/19/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022) 11/21/2021 | 479 | LETTER by Jordana H. Feldman as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Patrick J. Smith dated 11/15/2021 re: Rule 17(c) Subpoena to Jordana H. Feldman Document filed by Jordana H. Feldman. (Smith, Patrick) (Entered: 11/21/2021) 11/21/2021 | 480 | MOTION Authorizing a Subpoena Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P 17(c)(3) . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/21/2021) 11/21/2021 | 481 | LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 21, 2021 re: Redactions related to Witness—3 . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/21/2021) 11/21/2021 | 482 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. On November 1, 2021, the Defense noticed eight expert witnesses. Def. Br., Ex. 1 ("Notice"). On November 8, 2021, the Government filed a motion to partially preclude the testimony of two of those experts, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus. Gov't Br., Dkt. No. 424. The Defense filed a response via email on November 12, 2021, to permit the Government the opportunity to propose redactions. In an Opinion and Order temporarily filed under seal, the Court DENIES in part and GRANTS in part the Governments motion to preclude Dr. Dietz's testimony and DENIES in part and GRANTS in part the Governments motion to preclude Dr. Loftus's testimony. It doesso after considering the admissibility of the anticipated testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharms., Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993). The Court will send the temporarily sealed Opinion & Order to the parties. By November 23, 2021, the parties are ORDERED to inform the Court whether either seeks sealing or limited redactions of the Court's Opinion & Order, justifying any such request by reference to the three—part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). In addition, by that date, the parties are FURTHER ORDERED to file any proposed redactions to the Defenses response brief and/or supporting exhibits on the public docket, again justifying any such request by reference to the Lugosch test (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/21/21)Gw) (Entered: 11/22/2021) 11/21/2021 OPINION & ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court therefore denies in part and grants in part the Government's motion to preclude Dr. Dietz's testimony and denies in part and grants in part the Government's motion to preclude Dr. Loftus's testimony. This resolves docket number 424. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/21/2021) (See ORDER set forth) (ap) (Entered: 11/29/2021) 11/22/2021 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court will hold final pretrial conference on November 23, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 318 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. In accordance with its prior Order, the Court will ensure access for alleged victims and any members of the Defendants family. Dkt. No. 344. The public will be able to access the proceeding in overflow Courtrooms 110, 506, 905, and 906 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse. These overflow rooms will have live video and audio feeds of the proceeding. (Pretrial Conference set for 11/23/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 318, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan.). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/22/21)qGw) (Entered: 11/22/2021) 11/22/2021 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 475 Pursuant to the Court's email of November 15, 2021, the parties respectfully submit this joint letter to request video monitors with a live feed to the trial proceedings in each of the parties’ counsel rooms...ENDORSEMENT...To the extent that the Government is requesting that a video monitor be provided in a counsel room at 40 Foley Square, the request is granted to the extent the District Executive can accommodate the request. If the Government is requesting a video monitor in its own offices, the request is denied. The request is granted as to defense counsel's room. SO ORDERED (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/22/21)(Gjw) (Entered: 11/22/2021) DOJ-OGR- 00020451