DOJ-OGR-00020569.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page83 of 92 which the Court will question Juror 50 under oath. The Court further ORDERS that Juror 50's questionnaire be unsealed, for the reasons explained in the Opinion & Order. The Court will email counsel for Juror 50 a copy of his questionnaire and a copy of this Order. As also explained in the Opinion & Order, the Court will conduct the questioning at the public hearing with input from counsel for the Defendant and the Government. The parties may submit by email proposed questions in accordance with the Opinion & Order on or before March 1, 2022. The hearing will take place on March 8, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. The Court ORDERS Juror 50 to appear in Courtroom 906 of the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse, 40 Centre Street, New York, New York at that date and time to give testimony under oath in response to the Court's questions. The Court will ensure public access and will provide information on public access as soon as it is available. The Court will send the temporarily sealed Opinion & Order to the parties. By noon on February 25, 2022, the parties are ORDERED to inform the Court whether either seeks limited redactions to the Opinion & Order, conforming any requests to this Court's prior order, Dkt. No. 596, and justifying any such request by reference to the three—part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006). (Status Conference set for 3/8/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 906, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 2/24/2022) (ap) Modified on 2/25/2022 (ap). (Entered: 02/24/2022) LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated February 24, 2022 re: Court's February 24, 2022 Order (Dkt. No. 610) Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 02/24/2022) LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated January 13, 2022 re: Ms. Maxwell's Request for Juror 50's Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion to Intervene, Jury Questionnaire and Transcript Remain Under Seal Upon Resolution of Her Motion for a New Trial . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/24/2022) 02/24/2022 MOTION for New Trial . Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/24/2022) 02/24/2022 AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF OF THE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CRIMINAL DEFENSE LAWYERS. The Court should not allow any juror to thwart its screening process by giving inaccurate answers and thereby create such a grave potential, realized in this case, for depriving the defendant of her right to a fair trial. A new trial is required. Document filed as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (See BRIEF set forth) (ap) (Entered: 02/24/2022) 02/24/2022 MEMORANDUM in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell re 613 MOTION for New Trial .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C)(Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 02/24/2022) 02/24/2022 REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell re 613 MOTION for New Trial .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 3 (1 of 3), #2 Exhibit 3 (2 of 3), #3 Exhibit 3 of 3))(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 02/24/2022) 02/24/2022 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated January 13, 2022 re: Juror 50's Motion to Intervene Document filed by USA. (Pomerantz, Lara) (Entered: 02/24/2022) 02/24/2022 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 02/24/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt 610 (Sternheim, Bobbi) (Entered: 02/24/2022) MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 618 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Bobbi C Sternheim dated 02/24/2022 re: Letter in Response to Dkt 610. ENDORSEMENT: The Court approves the Defense's proposed redactions, which are narrowly tailored to redact specific categories of questions the Court may ask at the forthcoming hearing. Consistent with this Court's prior order, such redactions help ensure the integrity of the forthcoming hearing. See Dkt. No. 596. The Court will docket the redacted Opinion & Order. As noted in the prior order, the redactions will be promptly unsealed following the 02/24/2022 ICN _— a 02/24/2022 | 61 INO 02/25/2022 cN — Ke) DOJ-OGR-00020569