DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg
Extracted Text (OCR)
Case 22-1426, Document 43, 01/16/2023, 3452785, Page2 of 4
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
SECOND CIRCUIT
senemsoncrntrtonenrnoin ee: Docket No.: 22-1426
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
AFFIRMATION IN
Appellee, SUPPORT OF
DEFENDANT-
- against - APPELLANT’S
MOTION TO FILE
GHISLAINE MAXWELL, AN OVERSIZED
BRIEF
Defendant-Appellant.
ee eee eee TT
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of
New York and a partner of the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS PC.., attorneys
for Defendant-Appellant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, hereby affirms the following
statements, under penalties of perjury:
1. That I am a partner at the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C.,
attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell (hereinafter “Appellant”), and as such,
am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action.
3. On July 15, 2022, I filed a Notice of Appearance in this matter.
4. On July 28, 2022, I filed a scheduling request asking that Appellant’s brief be
due on January 30, 2023, based on the size of the record.
5. On January 12, 2023, 1 filed a motion to extend time to file Appellant’s brief to
February 28, 2023, to which Appellee United States Attomey’s Office for the Southern District
of New York had no objection. This motion is still pending.
6. Pursuant to Local Rule 32.1(a)(4), Appellant’s principal brief must be no longer
than 14,000 words.
T. Pursuant to Local Rule 27.1(e)(2), a party seeking to file an oversized brief must
state the requested length and the reasons for exceeding this Court’s limitations.
~ DOJ-OGR-00020607
Extracted Information
Document Details
| Filename | DOJ-OGR-00020607.jpg |
| File Size | 501.6 KB |
| OCR Confidence | 92.4% |
| Has Readable Text | Yes |
| Text Length | 1,595 characters |
| Indexed | 2026-02-03 20:00:15.385890 |