Back to Results

DOJ-OGR-00020612.jpg

Source: IMAGES  •  Size: 582.9 KB  •  OCR Confidence: 91.2%
View Original Image

Extracted Text (OCR)

Case 22-1426, Document 50, 02/14/2023, 3469305, Page‘ of 4 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SECOND CIRCUIT poten nnn nnn ne xX Docket No.: 22-1426 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AFFIRMATION IN SUPPORT OF Appellee, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT’S MOTION TO FILE - against - AN OVERSIZED BRIEF GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant-Appellant. gh rt a at X JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the State of New York and a partner of the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS PC., attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL, hereby affirms the following statements, under penalties of perjury: 1. That I ain a partner at the law firm of AIDALA, BERTUNA & KAMINS P.C., attorneys for Defendant-Appellant, Ghislaine Maxwell (hereinafter “Appellant”), and as such, am fully familiar with the facts and circumstances of this action. 2. On July 15, 2022, I filed a Notice of Appearance in this matter. 3. On July 28, 2022, I filed a scheduling request asking that Appellant’s brief be due on January 30, 2023, based on the size of the record. 4. On January 12, 2023, I filed a motion to extend time to file Appellant’s brief from January 30, 2023, to February 28, 2023, to which Appellee United States Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York had no objection. 5 On January 16, 2023, the motion to extend time was still pending. 6. Because a motion to file an oversized brief must be made no less than 14 days before the brief is due (Local Rule 27.1(e)3), pursuant to Local Rule 27.1(e)(2), I filed a DOJ-OGR-00020612

Document Preview

DOJ-OGR-00020612.jpg

Click to view full size

Document Details

Filename DOJ-OGR-00020612.jpg
File Size 582.9 KB
OCR Confidence 91.2%
Has Readable Text Yes
Text Length 1,544 characters
Indexed 2026-02-03 20:00:18.315967