DOJ-OGR-00020673.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document “Tast | 3475900, Page55 of 208 | A541 2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6 the jury selection dates provided by the Clerks Office, the Court amends theschedule that it set on June 2, 2021 as follows. The parties shall meet and confer and submit a joint proposed juror questionnaire and joint proposed voir dire by October 11, 2021. The parties shall file a joint proposed charge and verdict sheet, with any differing proposals supported by authority or other justification, by October 27, 2021. Any motions in limine must be simultaneously filed by October 18, 2021, and any responses to motions in limine are due by October 25, 2021. Otherwise, the parties shall continue to follow the schedule that the Court set on June 2, 2021. Dkt. No. 297. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties appear for an in-person pretrial conference on November 1, 2021 at 11:00 A.M. (Pretrial Conference set for 11/1/2021 at 11:00 AM before Judge Alison J. Nathan., Telephone Conference set for 10/21/2021 at 12:00 PM before Judge Alison J. Nathan.). (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 8/27/21)Qw) (Entered: 08/27/2021) 08/30/2021 LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated August 30, 2021 re: Response to Government Letter dated August 18, 2021, Dkt. 320 (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 08/30/2021) 09/01/2021 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated. September 1, 2021 re: Proposed Redactions Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 09/01/2021) 09/03/2021 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on re: 332 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated September 1, 2021 re: Proposed Redactions. ENDORSEMENT: The Court has reviewed the proposed redactions and finds that they are narrowly tailored and necessary to protect the privacy and identities of third parties not identified on the record in this case. The intended recipients of the subpoenas did not file proposed redactions by September 1, 2021, per this Court's August 23 Order. Dkt. No. 325. The Court accordingly ORDERS Defendant to file the redacted Motion and Exhibits 1, 3, and 4, and unredacted Exhibit 2, by September 7, 2021. The Court hereby unseals the August 13 Opinion, and the Court will file the Opinion on the public docket. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/2/2021) (ap) (Entered: 09/03/2021) 09/03/2021 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court ORDERS that at the same time that the Government discloses Jencks Act material, the Government shall also disclose to the defense the identities of any unnamed co-conspirators who allegedly participated in the conspiracies charged in the S2 indictment to whom the Government will refer at trial. The Government is FURTHER ORDERED to disclose all co-conspirator statements it intends to offer at trial no later than October 11, as consistent with this Court's scheduling order. Dkt. No. 297 at 1. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 9/3/2021) (See ORDER set forth) (ap) (Entered: 09/03/2021) 09/07/2021 MOTION for Discovery (Ex Parte and In Camera for an Order Authorizing a Subpoena Pursuant to Fed. R. Crim. P. 17(c)(3)). Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 09/07/2021) 10/05/2021 \e>) le) ~~] ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is currently in the process of planning logistics for trial in this matter and requires the parties' best and current estimate of length of trial. The Court plans to have the jury sit 5 days a week from 9am until 5pm. Given that jury selection will be complete by November 19 and opening statements will occur on November 29, the Court requests that the parties provide their best estimate as to when the jury is likely to begin deliberations. This will allow the Court to assess the likelihood that trial may continue after the Christmas holiday and therefore whether the jury may be https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 51/113 DOJ-OGR-00020673