DOJ-OGR-00020690.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document “Tace | 3475900, Page/2 of 208 | A-68_ 2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6 Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit C (Filed Under Seal), # 4 Exhibit D (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit E)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Main Document 453 replaced on 11/22/2021) Gw). (Entered: 11/12/2021) 11/12/2021 5 re ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As discussed at Wednesday's conference, the Court will hold an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 518 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. In accordance with its prior Order, the Court will ensure access for alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family. Dkt. No. 344. In order to comply with the District's COVID-19 protocols, the public will be able to access the proceeding in overflow Courtrooms 110 and 506 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse. These overflow rooms will have live video and audio feeds of the proceeding. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. The Court anticipates seating capacity in the overflow rooms for at least 5|0 members of the public. If capacity 1s reached, no additional persons will be admitted. Per the S.D.N.Y. Response to COVID-19, anyone who appears at any S.D.N.Y. courthouse must complete a questionnaire on the date of the proceeding prior to entering the courthouse. All visitors must also have their temperature taken when they arrive at the courthouse. Only persons who meet the entry requirements established by the questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter the courthouse. All visitors must wear a mask that covers the person's nose and mouth. Bandannas, gaiters, and masks with valves are not permitted. Ifa person does not have an approved mask, a screener will provide one. Anyone who fails to comply with the COVID-19 protocols that have been adopted by the Court will be required to leave the courthouse. There are no exceptions. For more information, please see https://www.nysd.uscourts. gov/covid-19-coronavirus. SO ORDERED. (Status Conference set for 11/15/2021 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 518, 40 Centre Street, New York, NY 10007 before Judge Alison J. Nathan) (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/12/2021) (nl) (Entered: 11/12/2021) LETTER MOTION addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 12, 2021 re: Clarification re pseudonym order . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021) 11/12/2021 55 11/12/2021 56 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated. November 12, 2021 re: Co-Conspirator Statements Document filed by USA. (Comey, Maurene) (Entered: 11/12/2021) 11/12/2021 58 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the Government's letter motion seeking clarification on two items from the November 1, 2021 pretrial conference. Dkt. No. 455. As to the first item, the Government seeks clarification about the line between permissible and impermissible cross-examination for witnesses testifying under a pseudonym. The Government's suggested level of generality as to permissible cross-examination of the witnesses' careers would unduly curtail the Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to meaningful cross-examination. See United States v. Figueroa, 548 F.3d 222, 227 (2d Cir. 2008). The line of questioning the Government identifies may be relevant to a juror's credibility determination and thus the Court will not limit the Defendant's ability to pursue such questioning on cross-examination. As the Court noted at the November 1 conference, the Defendant may not elicit the name of a specific employer, but the type and genre of employment may be relevant to the jury's assessment of credibilty. Nov. 1, 2021 Transcript at 11-12. As to the second item, the https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 68/113 DOJ-OGR-00020690