DOJ-OGR-00020705.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document “Tass | 3475900, Page87 of 208 | A-83_ 2/22/23, 1:25 PM SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6 Memorandum Opinion & Order ***]... Last, the Court emphasizes that while it currently denies the Defense's motion, the Defense may of course raise, and the Court will consider, objections that particular lines of questioning into witnesses’ backgrounds or lives are irrelevant, cumulative, intended to harass, or otherwise inappropriate. See, e.g., Smith v. Illinois, 390 U.S. 129, 133 (1968) (emphasizing that even when anonymity is not warranted, the court has a duty to protect a witness "from questions which go beyond the bounds of proper cross-examination merely to harass, annoy or humiliate him"). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 12/16/2021) 12/15/2021 694 | ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell. The Court is in receipt of the Government's motion to preclude certain testimony of defense witnesses, dated December 15, 2021. The Defense is ORDERED to submit a response as follows: - A response to the motion with respect to Dr. Loftus by today, December 15, 2021, at 7:45 p.m. - A response to the motion with respect to Alexander Hamilton by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 7:00 a.m. -A response to the motion with respect to the other anticipated witnesses by tomorrow, December 16, 2021, at 5:00 p.m. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/15/2021)(bw) (Entered: 06/29/2022) 12/16/2021 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties’ joint letter regarding the admission of prior inconsistent statements. The parties' letter notes "that many of these statements raise one of two questions: (1) must counsel show the witness the prior inconsistent statement under Rule 613(b), and (2) is a statement admissible when the witness affirms that the 3500 material contains the inconsistent statement and also expresses disagreement with the substance." The parties are hereby ORDERED to submit a letter citing authority (beyond the rule itself) for their respective positions. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to indicate each disputed prior inconsistent statement that was read into the record. Letters must be submitted as soon as possible but no later than today, December 16, 2021, at 10:15 p.m. The parties are FURTHER ORDERED to docket their respective letters by tomorrow, December 17, 2021, at 8:00 a.m. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/16/2021) (ap) Modified on 12/17/2021 (ap). (Entered: 12/17/2021) 12/16/2021 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court denies the motion for the remaining witnesses the Government seeks to preclude. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 12/16/2021) (ap) (Entered: 12/17/2021) 12/16/2021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alison J. Nathan: Jury Trial as to Ghislaine Maxwell held on 12/16/2021. Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell present with attorney Bobbi Sternheim, Jeff Pagliuca, Christian Everdell and Laura Menninger. AUSA Lara Pomerantz, Maurene Comey, Alison Moe and Andrew Rohrbach for the government. Court Reporters Martha Martin and George Malinowski Jury trial held. See Transcript. (jbo) (Entered: 12/20/2021) 12/17/2021 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated. December 17, 2021 re: Law enforcement witness testimony Document filed by USA. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2021) 12/17/2021 LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated. December 16, 2021 re: Prior inconsistent statements Document filed by USA. (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 12/17/2021) 12/17/2021 553 | LETTER by Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca dated December 16, 2021 re: Prior Inconsistent Statements (Pagliuca, Jeffrey) https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1 83/113 DOJ-OGR-00020705