DOJ-OGR-00020839.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 58_02/28/2023, 3475901, Page13 of 221 A-213 LCRVMAXT 3132 some kind. And ntire note s ms to be about transportation of to the instruction in so we would propose just referring them its entirety. MR. EV. ERDELL: I don't find this note Your Honor, confusing. And I think simply saying it's confusing -- THE COURT: Well, find it confusing. For example, don't know if this is a question about aiding and abetting. don't know. MR. EV. ERDELL: Your Honor, I think this is pretty —- I think this is a question about whether you can hold her that she had accountable for a return flight, if you believe that From New something to do with arranging return flight first EG Mexico; whereas the Flight New Mexico may have been —- at least there's some testimony to consider about whether that was for the purpose of illegal sexual activity. It was not true of the return flight, the flight back, wherever she was home, somewher from Mr. going, lse, somewhere away Epstein. I think they are asking, Can we consider if Ms. that Maxwell had anything to do with that flight, arranging of They are saying with a P.C. the intent was to flight 20 flight, whether she can be convicted, because it's on the 21 return trip from an area where Jan 22 sexual abuse. 23 THE COURT: But it says where/if 24 ngag for Jane to engage in sexual activity. 25 MR. EVERDELL: Right. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, (212) 805-0300 claims she was involved in DOJ-OGR-00020839