DOJ-OGR-00000211.tif

11 the Office [Eastern District of New York USAO], the NSD [National Security Division of the United States Department of Justice], and the Defendants, and does not bind any other division or section of the Department of Justice or any other federal, state, local or foreign prosecuting, administrative or regulatory authority.” United States v. Lafarge S.A., No. 1:22-cr-00444-WFK, ECF No. 10 (Oct. 18, 2022), at 3. District of New Jersey: “This agreement is limited to the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Jersey and cannot bind other federal, state, or local authorities.” United States v. Goldfield, No. 1:16-er-005138- JBS, ECF No. 39 (Dee. 22, 2016), at 4. Southern District of New York: “This Agreement does not bind any federal, state, or local prosecuting authority other than this Office.” United States v. Ellison, No. 22-CR-673 (RA), at 4 (Dec. 18, 2022), at 4.7 Middle District of Pennsylvania: “Nothing in this Agreement shall bind any other United States Attorney’s Office, state prosecutor’s office, or federal, state or local law enforcement agency.” United States v. Coccagna, No. 1:22-cr-00407-YK, ECF No. 3-1 (Dec. 2, 2022), at 29. Northern District of Texas. “This agreement is limited to the United States Department of Justice, Criminal Division, Fraud Section and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Texas, and 2. Available at https://fm.cnbe.com/applications/enbe.com/ resources/editorialfiles/2022/12/21/1671676065196-Caroline _ Ellison Plea Agreement.pdf (accessed May 5, 2025). DOJ-OGR-00000211