DOJ-OGR-00021035.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 58_02/28/2023, 3475901, Page209 of 221 A-409 34 MeSQmaxl With respect to the testimony of the pilots who testified, whether they whether an employee was paid by Maxwell or Epstein or technically reported to one, according to The their job descriptions, is not the question here. fact that pilots based on their observation thought at one point that Kellen reported to Maxwell that she had proves the point en and exercised it, whether in a upervisory authority over Kell] their he chain of command or on formal fan employment paperwork, it makes no n he was just an employee for one or the other, difference. Ther was an overlap here. They had different roles in the conspiracy, and the defendant had a supervisory roll over Kellen. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, just to that point. Being present does not mean that you're a supervisor. That's way too So the far a stretch. fact that there was testimony she was present still in the house while Kellen was making the calls and scheduling the massage appointments means nothing in terms of supervisory authority. THE COURT: Thank you. Other enhancements before the government's objection is to be addressed. MS. MOE: No, your Honor. Thank you. MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I assume you don't want to 23 24 25 hear or have repeated and any questions about the dangerous sex of Fenders. five-point enhancement Lor THE COURT: [ believe I have what I need, but as I SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.¢e-° (212) 805-0300 DOJ-OGR-00021035