DOJ-OGR-00021034.jpg

20 21 22 23 24 25 Case 22-1426, MeSQmaxl clearer, your Kellen was an belied by the believe is what the governn Honor, assistant of both originally testified, both. didn't that she was an assistant And again, testimony who was the actual assistant says unequivocally, But on cross-examination, know what her role was, 5 wT Document 58_02/28/2023, 3475901, Page208 of 221 A-408 33 this notion that she was somehow -- Sarah trial record. If you look at Larry Visoski's testimony, oh, and his for Epstein. ment is relying on there, I think she was an assistant Epstein and Maxwell is again which I he for he conceded that he really best recollection was ust look again at assistant." supervising Sarah Kellen. opposite, enhancement. THE COURT: enhancements MS. MOE: to the leadership question, attention, testimony at Sarah Kellen was still arrived So there is no and it can't provide a basis Yo we noted this on page 27 of trial was that Carolyn recal took over calling to schedul present inside the Palm fair Cimberly for Ms. was her assistant. inference that Ms. Espinosa's Maxwell, and she Kellen was Epstein's Maxwell was Th inferenc All right. ur Honor, just very Anything is exactly the for that leadership further on the for the government's objection? briefly with respect our brief, just want to direct the Court's but the led that even after le massages, Maxwell Beach residenc when Carolyn for massage appointments. SOUTHE iRN DISTR CT REPORTERS, 12) 805-0300 P.C. s#s DOJ-OGR-00021034