DOJ-OGR-00021051.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page4 of 113 2. The McDonough Test: The Second Prong... 66 E. The District Court Abused its Discretion in the Manner in Which it Conducted the Post-Trial Hearing ..............:eee 68 1. The Court Erred in Precluding Defense Counsel From Questioning Juror 50.0... ccccccescseeesnteeeecteeeeseneeess 69 Z, FRE 606 Did Not Prevent Inquiry into Juror 50’s Use of Prior Abuse in Persuading Jury to Convict Maxwell ........cceccceccceceeneeesneeeeneeceeeeeenaeeeeneeesaeees 70 F. The District Court Erred in Finding that (1) Juror 50 was Not Biased and (2) Juror 50 Would Not Have Been Stricken Even if He Had Answered the Questions ACCUrAateLY oo... ceccccceesseceesereeceeaeeeeseeecnsaeeeeecaeeesseneeeseqeeeeneneeess 71 POINT IV THE COURT CONSTRUCTIVELY AMENDED COUNTS THREE AND FOUR OF THE INDICTMENT ..........ceccceeceesteeereeeteeeteeenneess 73 A. —_ Background Facts... .ccccccccssccesssececseneeeessneeessneeesnseeeescureeensnees 74 1. The Jury Note 2.0... cccccccccsseceeseneeeesneceesneeesssneeesscueeeeseeeeees 74 | SP 0) 0) UCere] 0) (ole We -) ee 75 1. The “Core of Criminality” of Counts Three and Four Was a Scheme to Cause Underaged Girls to Travel to New York with an Intent to Violate New YOLK LAW oo. eecccccceesneecesnseeeesneeesnsneeceeaeeeeneeeesseteeeesnneeeseas 76 2. There is a Substantial Likelihood that Maxwell Was Convicted on Counts Three and Four Based on Conduct Not Charged in the Indictment............... 77 C. The Variance Between the Proof at Trial and the Allegations in the Indictment Substantially Prejudiced Maxwell ......ccccccccseecccccceseeccccccesecccccussecceceassececaaeseeeeceaaeseceeees 81 POINT V THE SENTENCE SHOULD BE VACATED AND REMANDED FOR RESENTENCING AS THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN APPLYING AN INCORRECT GUIDLINE RANGE AND OFFENSE LEVEL ooo. ceenceccesneecnenaeeecnseeecesaaeceesaeeeesneecesaaeeeesaeeeensaaes 82 ill DOJ-OGR-00021051