DOJ-OGR-00021065.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document 59, 02/28/2023, 3475902, Page18 of 113 5. Whether the District Court’s sentence was based on a miscalculation of the guideline range that resulted in the imposition of an upward variance in the absence of providing the required explanation, and whether the District Court erred in applying the aggravating role adjustment when there was no evidence to support a finding that Defendant supervised another criminal participant. DOJ-OGR-00021065