DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif

10 Agreement between the Defendant, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, and the Civil Rights Division and is binding only on the parties to the agreement, supersede all prior understandings, if any, whether written or oral, and cannot be modified except in writing, signed by all parties and filed with the Court, or on the record in open court.” United States v. Gibson, No. 1:20-cr-00094, ECF No. 148 (Mar. 30, 2022), at 17. Eastern District of Michigan: “The Defendant understands and agrees that this Agreement is between the Fraud Section and the Defendant and does not bind any other division or section of the Department of Justice or any other federal, state, or local prosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authority.” United States v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc., No. 2:23-cr-20174-LVP-DRG, ECF No. 12 (May 18, 2023), at 4. District of Minnesota: “This Plea Agreement binds only the Defendant and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice. ... This Plea Agreement does not bind any other state or federal agency.” United States v. Detloff Marketing and Asset Management, Inc., No. 18-cr-00197-PAM-HB, ECF No. 96 July 25, 2019), at 1. Eastern District of Missouri: “This agreement does not, and is not intended to, bind any governmental office or agency other than the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri.” United States v. Maltk, No. 4:24-cr-00010-HEA, ECF No. 127 (Apr. 4, 2023), at 1. Eastern District of New York: “The Defendants understand and agree that this Agreement is among DOJ-OGR-00000210