DOJ-OGR-00000209.tif

9 Central District of California: “This agreement is limited to the [Central District of California] USAO and cannot bind any other federal, state, local, or foreign prosecuting, enforcement, administrative, or regulatory authorities.” United States v. Koo, No. 2:23-cr-00568- DSF-1, ECF No. 8 (Nov. 20, 2023), at 1. District of Colorado: “This agreement binds only the Criminal Division of the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Colorado and the defendant.” United States v. Chuong, No. 1:21-cr-00164, ECF No. 67 (July 7, 2022), at 1. District of Columbia: “Your client further understands that this Agreement is binding only upon the Criminal and Superior Court Divisions of the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia as well as the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity Section. This Agreement does not bind the Civil Division of this Office or any other United States Attorney’s Office, nor does it bind any other state, local, or federal prosecutor.” United States v. Patel, No. 1:19-cr-00081-RDM, ECF No. 4 (April 4, 2019), at 11-12. Northern District of Georgia: “The United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia agrees not to bring further criminal charges against the Defendant related to the charges to which he is pleading guilty. The Defendant understands that this provision does not bar prosecution by any other federal, state, or local jurisdiction.” United States v. Woods, No. 1:23-cr-00064, ECF No. 8-1 (Mar. 3, 2023), at 4. Southern District of Indiana: “This document and the addendum constitute the complete and only Plea DOJ-OGR-00000209