DOJ-OGR-00021310.jpg

Case 22-1426, Document ON 36. 3536038, Page138 of 258 Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 136 of 348 On Monday, June 23, 2008, Roth sent a brief letter to Starr and Lefkowitz informing them that the office had “completed a thorough review” of the USAO’s handling of the Epstein matter and did not believe intervention by the Deputy Attorney General was warranted in view of the “considerable discretion” vested by the Department in U.S. Attorneys. He added, “Even if we were to substitute our judgment for that of the U.S. Attorney, we believe that federal prosecution of this case is appropriate.” Immediately after receiving a copy of Roth’s letter, Villafafia notified defense counsel that Epstein would have until close of business on Monday, June 30, 2008, to comply with the NPA by entering his guilty plea, being sentenced, and surrendering to begin serving his sentence. On June 26, 2008, Roth alerted the Office of the Attorney General that Epstein’s counsel might try to contact the Attorney General to request additional review and urged the Attorney General not to take defense counsel’s calls. Roth told OPR that he was concerned that Epstein’s team would try to take a further appeal in order to delay resolution of the case. Meanwhile, Starr sent a concluding email to Acosta, acknowledging they had reached “the end of a long and arduous road” and adding, “While I am obviously very unhappy at what I believe is the government’s treatment of my client, aman whom I have come to deeply admire, I recognize that we have filed and argued our ‘appellate motions’ and lost.... I would like to have . . . some closure with you on this matter so that in the years to come, neither of us will harbor any ill will over the matter.” X. JUNE 2008 — JUNE 2009: EPSTEIN ENTERS HIS PLEAS AND SERVES HIS CUSTODIAL SENTENCE On Friday, June 27, 2008, Villafafia renewed her requests to Epstein’s local attorneys Goldberger and Black for a copy of the state plea agreement reached with the State Attorney’s Office, noting that their failure to provide it was a material breach of the NPA. After receiving and reviewing the plea agreement form, which was not yet signed, Villafafia sent another letter to Goldberger and Black, informing them that the proposed sentencing provision did not comply with the requirements of the NPA. Specifically, as written, the plea agreement called for a sentence of 12 months in “the Palm Beach County Detention Facility,” followed consecutively by “18 months Community Control” with a special condition that the defendant serve “the first 6 months [of community control] in the Palm Beach County Detention Facility.” Villafafia objected to the community control provision, reminding Goldberger and Black that the NPA required Epstein to “make a binding recommendation of eighteen months imprisonment, which means confinement twenty-four hours a day at the County Jail.” In a subsequent email to Sloman, Villafafia recounted that she had spoken about the issue with Goldberger, who “‘swore’ that Epstein would be in custody 24-hours-a-day during the community confinement portion of his sentence.” Villafafia added that Goldberger “let it slip that Epstein would not be at the jail, he would be at the stockade .... Since we specifically discussed this at the meeting with [the State Attorney] months ago that Epstein would be at [the jail], this certainly violates the spirit of the [NPA] agreement.”'” Villafafia told Sloman, “[S]omething smells very bad.” i The Main Detention Center for Palm Beach County is a facility housing maximum, medium, and minimum custody adult males, as well as juvenile and special population male and female inmates. See 110 DOJ-OGR-00021310