DOJ-OGR-00021552.jpg

20 a1 22 23 24 25 Case 22-1426, Document ON 376. 3536039, Page122 of 217 Me6eSQmaxl material So to sentencing or not, I believe the am prepared to address it. first first -- what see as your continued objection is to paragraph 22. Juan Alessi's testimony that the defendant targeted Virginia af lot. MR. EVERD ELL: Yes, that's correct, THE COURT: I'm just getting my submissions. your Honor. I do credit overrule th objection. identified and target Jane. Paragraph thr Ios thr objections to this paragraph. Is that a continuing objection, Mr. Everdell? MR. EVERDELL: Paragraph three, your Honor? THE COURT: 23. I apologize. MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor. THE COURT: overrule the objection. The first objection is regarding the conclusion that Ms. Maxwell was author of the essay in the paragraph. I overrule the object The defendant also worked with FLer seeing her in the Mar-a-Lago parking Epstein to identify and the tion because a reasonable inference supported by the trial evidence is tha that the de t the comput fendant authored the essay. Metadata indicated Ler was registered to "GMax" and the document was saved under the user name "Ghislaine." The second objection is to the assertion that Epstein transferred Ms . Maxwell conspiracy. overrule that objection. Bank statements SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.°ee° (212) 805-0300 DOJ- approximately $23 million during the OGR-00021552